Volante Commentary
One of those tolerant Atheists took the liberty of depriving my car of my Jesus fish. Atheists today remind me of little children. They wobble around, uttering nonsense and destroying things they touch. You might think that would make them cute, but you'd be wrong. When tall bearded guys walk around chanting "The Second Law of Thermodynamics is false", that would be more easily classified as creepy. When Atheism starts denying the most accepted laws of physics, then maybe it should be reconsidered.
"For, if no natural means can be found for a phenomenon, then that becomes evidence for the supernatural; if no natural cause exists, then that becomes proof for the supernatural." - Bob Enyart
In a moderated debate on TheologyOnline in the Battle Royale forum, Bob Enyart demolishes his atheist opponent by giving evidence for God. His tactic is one the atheists cannot refute: science. It gets them every time. One of the best evidences Enyart proposes comes from the realm of physics.
Atheism contradicts the most widely accepted laws of physics, that of the First and Second laws of Thermodynamics. The First Law of Thermodynamics states that matter cannot be created or destroyed, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that entropy (disorder) always increases, thus necessitating a beginning. This poses a problem for the atheist: Has the universe always been in existence? Did it create itself from nothing? The only other option is that it would be supernaturally created. Since no other method than these three can be logically conceived, the atheist looks like a fool. The universe cannot create itself from nothing (First Law), and it could not have always been (Second Law). This leaves, by default, the Third option, leading to Theism.
Huh?!?!?
People are STUPID!
30 March 2004
Atheism illogical; cannot be proven
Posted by wb at 04:38
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Why does he have to drag physics into this? What the hell did physics do to him?Oh, yeah, it proved he's an idiot.
see, with the jebus, we don't have to follow any laws of nature or physics, we make them up as it fits our argument.and wouldn't entropy increase say after an event like the creation of the universe? so since there was no "beginning", then there can't be entropy, it never would happen. but wasn't it a scientist that defined entropy in the first place? so, therefore, there must be a beginning. now, i never thought that the universe was just nothing..a big void. it was just a mass of uninteresting, non-descript stuff...then something happened and we have lots of complex stuff (entropy happening). so...ummm, yeah. nice try jebusers. thanks for telling the atheists what they believe. i, of course, am not an atheist as i believe in the one true GOD...me. and to tell the truth, i made the universe out of legos and some extra grass seed i had laying around.
ah, grass seed...that explains my allergies.
yeah...sorry about that all.
his domain expired... he's workin' on it.
ahso.
what's up with redpeanut, all. can't get it to load. you updating?
deadpeanut
Post a Comment